심리학의 원리/심리학의 원리2
What likely remains true, having said that, is that a lot of Guys Have got a a lot less auditory and a more articulatory verbal creativeness than they are apt to know about. The experiment proves how dependent our verbal creativity is on real thoughts in lips, tongue, throat, larynx, etc. The frequently-received thought is that it's just a milder diploma of the identical course of action which took place once the issue now imagined was sensibly perceived. Trust me, who for many a thousand year Precisely the same rough meat have chewed and analyzed, That from the cradle towards the bier No gentleman the ancient leaven has digested! In favor on the sensationalistic or nativistic perspective of 1 such case, see the essential paper by Von Kries, Archiv f. When we come to check hallucinations in the chapter on Outer Notion, we shall see this is not at all a detail of scarce prevalence. A person blind of his Visible brain-centres can no much more see darkness out from the parts of his retina that are connected with the Mind-lesion than he can see it out on the skin of his again.
The most vivid touch-images come when we ourselves barely escape local injury, or when we see another injured. It would seem that in such a case the neural process corresponding to the imagination must be the entire tract concerned in the actual sensation, even down as far as the retina. Life somewhat better might content him, But for the gleam of heavenly light which Thou hast lent him: He calls it Reason--thence his power's increased, To be far beastlier than any beast. So far as I know there is only one other published report of a similar experience. Enter not so stall-fed quite, Like elephant-calves about one! A few monographs by competent observers, like Stricker, about their own peculiarities, would give much more valuable information about the diversities which prevail. Moreover there are no facts which oblige us to think that, within the occipital cortex, one part is connected with sensation and another with mere ideation or imagination. To most people the image is at first 'thick,' as the sound of the word would be if they tried to pronounce it with the lips parted. So of a baby crying in a distant part of the house, we are uncertain whether we still hear it, or only imagine the sound.
A good way of bringing The issue to consciousness is usually that proposed by Stricker: Partly open your mouth and afterwards envision any word with labials or dentals in it, like 'bubble, 'toddle.' Is your image beneath these problems unique? The movements of articulate speech play a predominant part in his mental daily life. I am going to Enjoy the comedy with artwork. The enigmatic reports from the impact of magnets and metals, even should they be owing, as several contend, to unintentional suggestion around the operator's part, certainly contain hyperæsthetic perception, for the operator seeks as well as feasible to conceal the moment when the magnet is introduced into Enjoy, and nevertheless the subject not simply finds it out that second in a way obscure, but might develop results which (in the initial occasion surely) the operator didn't look forward to finding. The boy enjoying 'I spy,' the prison skulking from his pursuers, the superstitious human being hurrying with the woods or past the churchyard at midnight, The person missing inside the woods, the Woman who tremulously has designed an night appointment together with her swain, all are subject matter to illusions of sight and audio which make their hearts defeat till They can be dispelled.
THE NEURAL PROCESS WHICH UNDERLIES IMAGINATION? This is inexplicable if the imagination be simply a weaker excitement of the sensational process. The truth seems to be that the cases where peripheral sense-organs are directly excited in consequence of imagination are exceptional rarities, if they exist at all. In persons whose auditory imagination is weak, the articulatory image seems to constitute the whole material for verbal thought. What you have no idea of you cannot miss; and their not definitely missing this great region out of their sight seems due to the fact that their very idea and memory of it is lost along with the sensation. A statistical inquiry on a large scale, into the variations of acoustic, tactile, and motor imagination, would probably bear less fruit than Galton's inquiry into visual images. Now we know that currents usually flow one way in the nervous system; and for the peripheral sense-organs to be excited in these cases, the current would have to flow backward. Were there centres for crude optical sensation below the cortex, the patients in these cases would still feel light and darkness.